Auction or Gallery status
User login

Forgot your password or username?

Register Now

Shop Catalogue

Publisher: ANONYMOUS
Title: MEMORANDUM Vlade Demokratske Federativne Jugoslavije po pitanju Juliske Krajine i drugih jugoslavenskih teritorija pod Italijom.
Published in: London, 1946
Size: 11.4 x 8.1 inches.
29.0 x 20.7 cm.

Colour printed.
Condition: 22pp., with cartographic annex contains 8 maps. Largest map opens to 290mm x 400mm.
Condition Rating

Memorandum of the government of the Democratic Federative Yugoslavia concerning the questions of the Jilian March and other Yugoslav territories under Italy.

Julian March is an area of south-eastern Europe which is divided among Croatia, Italy and Slovenia. This booklet tells the story of Yugoslavian people and migration among others. A cartographic annex contains 8 folded maps which illustrates the purpose.

On March 7, 1946, members of the Inter-Allied Boundary Commission arrived to Trieste to compile a report and to suggest the drawing of the state border between Yugoslavia and Italy. Within the next 28 days (until April 5), the commission visited Zone A and Zone B of the Julian March and the Venetian Slovenia and realized that a great deal of work needed to be done.

Western Yugoslav border became an issue soon after the Second World War, mostly due to the increasingly apparent cold war between the former allies. Demarcation line between Italy and Yugoslavia was turned into a matter of ideology since both states were seen as guardians of their respective blocs. In September 1945, Edvard Kardelj, the head of the Yugoslav delegation, presented before the Council of Foreign Ministers in London the position of the Yugoslav government on the new demarcation line between the two states. The Yugoslav delegation demanded that the former Austo-Hungarian territory, which was inhabited mostly by Yugoslavs and which after WWI was annexed to Italy with complete disrespect to the nation's right of self-determination, now become part of Yugoslavia.
According to Yugoslav proposition, Italy was to receive a little less than 200 km˛ with approximately 30,000 inhabitants, whereas Yugoslavia was to receive 900 km˛ with a population of 80,000. Trieste was to become one of the Yugoslav federal units and its port was to be an independent port. Italy presented its completely different viewpoint as well. In the end, the London meeting of the Council of Foreign Ministers produced no results, since the positions of the great powers in regard to the issue of the border were far too conflicting.

In January 1946, the Council of Deputy Foreign Ministers began drafting peace treaties with Italy. For this purpose they set up a commission of experts from Great Britain, Soviet Union, the USA, and France. Its mission was to review the propositions of the opposing sides on the spot. Obeying the instructions issued by the Deputy Foreign Ministers for the work of boundary commission, the British Foreign Minister Bevin at the end of February 1946 stated that the commission's first priority was to determine the ethnic border that would leave a minimal number of people of certain nationality under foreign authority. He added that the commission would also need to take into consideration economic and geographic conditions, and study in detail all border related research that the Council received from Yugoslav and Italian governments. On March 2, 1946, the Council announced that border commission was finally set up. Each delegation consisted of 5 to 13 members (Soviet delegation being most numerous).
The British delegation was led by professor Waldock of the Oxford University, the Soviet delegation by V. S. Gerašenko, the American delegation by P. E. Mosely, the assistant editor of the magazine Foreign Affairs, and the French delegation by diplomat M. Wolfram.

The members of the border commission were eagerly anticipated throughout the territory of the Julian March. Patriotic passion on both sides reached its peak. Numerous gatherings were organized by the local population to convince the members of the commission of pro-Italian or pro-Yugoslav feelings among the locals. Unfortunately, there was also violence involved. The worst incident with several deaths and a number of wounded took place in the Trieste suburban area of Škedenj on March 9. The commission collected data from five sizable towns, 27 villages, it performed 52 interviews and received around 4000 petitions.

Pro-Yugoslav organizations demanded the territory to be assigned to Yugoslavia. On March 11, 1946, in such heated atmosphere, the members of the boundary commission received the representatives of the Regional National Liberation Committee for the Slovenian Littoral and Trieste, who declared themselves (also in their introductory letter) elected representatives of all Slovenian and most of the Italian population of the Slovenian Littoral and Trieste. They handed to the members of the commission their memorandum which was divided into three parts by means of which they justified the necessity for the entire Julian March and Trieste to be assigned to Yugoslavia. Memorandum was written in Slovene and in other world languages. The first segment described the ethnic composition of the local population, claiming that the territory of the Julian March was densely populated by Slovenians and Croats, whereas Italians there formed only language islands. They were trying to prove that Slovenians and Croats in the Julian March made up the majority of population. They referred to the last more or less objective official census of 1910 (compared to the Italian census of 1921), although the census of 1910 was also damaging to Slovenians due to its inaccurate use of the term language of communication instead of the term nationality. The second section of the memorandum was devoted to economic development of the territory and Trieste. In it, the authors of the memorandum aimed to prove economic dependency of Trieste on its hinterland, particularly Yugoslavia.
These claims were based on data about the 1912 rail freight transport in Trieste, when the territory of (the future) Yugoslavia provided for as much as 38.6 % of all cargo. They furthermore stated that the economy of the Julian March and Trieste is complimentary to that of Yugoslavia. The latter could provide the Julian March with raw materials and farm produce.
The third part of the memorandum focused on destructive consequences that certain political events had had on the Slavic population of the Julian March (such as the Treaty of London of April 26, 1915 and the Treaty of Rapallo of November 1920). There was also much talk about the resistance of the local population in the Julian March during WWII to achieve national freedom and incorporation of the region into Yugoslavia.

Once its work was completed, the commission prepared a joint report but the suggestions about the possible border were very different. For Italy the most favourable was the American proposal, according to which Yugoslavia would get the Soca Valley region in the North, as well as the Trnovo Forest Plateau, the Komen Karst, the mountainous Istria, and the Ucka.
The British suggestion was a bit different than the American one – Yugoslavia was also to receive the territory around the Raša coalmine. The Soviet proposal, of course, was closest to Yugoslav demands. The French suggestion was a compromise between the Soviet and the British suggestions. Only the Soviet delegation would assign Trieste to Yugoslavia.

During their stay in the Julian March, the members of the boundary commission saw only what they wanted to see and made judgements in accordance with instructions of their respective countries. In this sense, their work can only be seen as a minor episode in the Yugoslav-Italy border conflict. The rest of the story is now known. On February 1947, a peace treaty with Italy was signed in Paris, which only partly resolved the issue of the Julian March. By October 1954, when the so-called London Memorandum was signed, the only open questions had to do with Trieste and Zone A and Zone B of the Free Territory of Trieste. The border between Yugoslavia and Italy was finally determined with the signing of the Treaty of Osimo on November 10, 1975.

map Thumbnail Catalogue  book Catalogue  Category:  Europe | Eastern Europe | Balkans | Check Archive |

Click image to zoom old map image
ANONYMOUS -  MEMORANDUM Vlade Demokratske Federativne Jugoslavije po pitanju Juliske Krajine i drugih jugoslavenskih teritorija pod Italijom.
ANONYMOUS - MEMORANDUM Vlade Demokratske Federativne Jugoslavije po pitanju Juliske Krajine i drugih jugoslavenskih teritorija pod Italijom. high resolution image of old map
Click image to zoom old map image

For more than 40 years we have been selling genuine old maps, atlases, prints, posters. Every item on this site is clearly dated and priced and was engraved on copper, unless otherwise stated.

Measurements exclude the margins and are provided in both millimeters and inches, with height given first.
Color was done by hand. 'Original colors' means that the item was colored at, or about, the time of it's original publication. When the term 'Colored' appears, it means that the map was more recently colored, likely in this century or at the end of last century.
A color code is used help and we use a condition rating system. help
In addition, we have created a unique HiBCOR grading system which we believe can assist all collectors in forming a collection. Please take the time to read this.

Certificate of authenticity Warranty
We warranty the authenticity of each map, print, atlas, poster or medieval manuscript described in this catalogue. Our warranty means that there is no time limitation to our guarantee of authenticity and if there is ever discovered that something bought here is not authentic, your money will be returned. We stand by what we sell.
- We try to carefully note any splits, tears, discoloration or other defects and to assist buyers we use a condition rating system that can be found here: help
  Please note that if the condition report does not show any remarks about splits, tears, discoloration, etc. this means there are none to be found in the item described. Splits, tears, discoloration and other defects are carefully noted. In addition we use a condition rating system help
 As a general rule we try to offer maps of a high quality standard

- A certificate of authenticity is provided for each acquired map, print, atlas, poster or medieval manuscript.

- The items in the Fixed-sale catalog are available for immediate purchase without any commission charged.
- Generally, sales are not subject to VAT or Sales Tax; however, we are required by law to add 7% sales tax to the bill of buyers from within the state of Florida.
- There is a shipping fee of $25 per combined shipment (we are happy to combine all your purchases foreach sale into one package) and this one fee will also include handling and insurance.

- We accept checks, Visa, Mastercard, PayPal, and bank transfers.

Click for more details about buying in fix sale gallery, or bidding at auction.
Many answers are likely to find in help section.

Paulus Swaen Internet Auction
is the first internet auction specializing in old maps, Medieval manuscripts and prints. It is a unique place for buying and selling antique maps, atlases, books, and medieval manuscripts.
We are in the map business for 40 years! more
Lot number: 43859

ANONYMOUS - MEMORANDUM Vlade Demokratske Federativne Jugoslavije po pitanju Juliske Krajine i drugih jugoslavenskih teritorija pod Italijom.

Price :$ 300
Approx. Euro 252  

This item is available for immediate sale.
Click here to continue.
How to buyhelp
Inquire about this Item.

H!BCoR*** help

 Add to my gallery  
Like this item?
Thinking about buying later on?
Or just create a virtual collection !
With Wishlist you can collect all
Your Favorite maps in one place
by simply pressing a button!
[ Read More ]


Buy this item Price : $ 300

How to buy this item
No commission is charged. Shipping fee is $25 per combined shipment, including handling and insurance.
Click on 'Buy it now' button and fill in your name and email address. In the comment field please ad I would like to buy this item or any other question you might have.
We will contact you again within 24 hours. (more)